Rate control strategy
Whether a rate control or rhythm control strategy is chosen is very specific to each individual patient. Factors to consider are: ability to tolerate medications, degree of symptoms, degree of functional limitation, occupation, age, and other co-morbidities. While many practitioners may have It's been debated whether rate control or rhythm control for afib is the better strategy, but Patrick Ellinor, MD, PhD, director of the Arrhythmia/Step Down Unit at the Corrigan Minehan Heart The cornerstones of atrial fibrillation (AF) management are rate control and anticoagulation [1, 19] and rhythm control for those symptomatically limited by AF. [] The clinical decision to use a rhythm-control or rate-control strategy requires an integrated consideration of several factors, including degree of symptoms, likelihood of successful cardioversion, presence of comorbidities, and Methods: This was a pooled analysis of randomized studies comparing either rhythm control using antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) versus rate control (Subset A, four studies, 2,486 patients) or catheter ablation (CA) versus rate control (Subset B, seven studies, 1,112 patients) in patients with AF and HF. Rate control medications don't cure atrial fibrillation, so this medication regimen becomes life-long and may allow atrial enlargement, a condition where the atria enlarge due to being overworked. Recent research has shown that this increases the risk of stroke as well. Slowing the rate of dysarthric speakers did not have as marked an impact on speech naturalness as it did for normal speakers whose naturalness decreased at slowed rates. Metered rate control strategies were associated with the lowest ratings of naturalness for all subject groups. Objectives The study sought to evaluate clinical outcomes in clinical practice with rhythm control versus rate control strategy for management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Background Randomized trials have not demonstrated significant differences in stroke, heart failure, or mortality between rhythm and rate control strategies. The comparative outcomes in contemporary clinical practice are not
Oct 14, 2019 Comparative occurrence of ischemic stroke with the rhythm versus rate control strategy in a national prospective cohort of atrial fibrillation
Jun 3, 2014 Pharmacologic rate- and rhythm-control strategies have comparable efficacy across outcomes in primarily older patients with mild AF symptoms. Jul 2, 2017 Does rhythm or rate control strategy influence anticoagulant treatment in older patients with atrial fibrillation? Data from REPOSI. S. Damanti. Feb 14, 2005 rhythm and rate control strategies as first-line therapy in patients with be recurrent, a strategy of ventricular rate control, in combination with FULL TEXT Abstract: Comparisons of rhythm and rate control strategies for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are still inconclusive. We Jul 28, 2015 Within CHF patients rate control is the most widely used strategy to manage AF, having proved non-inferior to rhythm control strategies. However, Oct 14, 2019 Comparative occurrence of ischemic stroke with the rhythm versus rate control strategy in a national prospective cohort of atrial fibrillation Rate control therapy is usually preferred but the preferred treatment strategy to that of AF, consisting of anticoagulation, and rate or rhythm control strategies.
Rate control therapy is usually preferred but the preferred treatment strategy to that of AF, consisting of anticoagulation, and rate or rhythm control strategies.
In this multicenter, randomized trial involving patients with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure, the routine use of a rhythm-control strategy did not reduce the rate of death from Whether a rate control or rhythm control strategy is chosen is very specific to each individual patient. Factors to consider are: ability to tolerate medications, degree of symptoms, degree of functional limitation, occupation, age, and other co-morbidities. While many practitioners may have It's been debated whether rate control or rhythm control for afib is the better strategy, but Patrick Ellinor, MD, PhD, director of the Arrhythmia/Step Down Unit at the Corrigan Minehan Heart The cornerstones of atrial fibrillation (AF) management are rate control and anticoagulation [1, 19] and rhythm control for those symptomatically limited by AF. [] The clinical decision to use a rhythm-control or rate-control strategy requires an integrated consideration of several factors, including degree of symptoms, likelihood of successful cardioversion, presence of comorbidities, and
Objectives The study sought to evaluate clinical outcomes in clinical practice with rhythm control versus rate control strategy for management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Background Randomized trials have not demonstrated significant differences in stroke, heart failure, or mortality between rhythm and rate control strategies. The comparative outcomes in contemporary clinical practice are not
The cornerstones of atrial fibrillation (AF) management are rate control and anticoagulation [1, 19] and rhythm control for those symptomatically limited by AF. [] The clinical decision to use a rhythm-control or rate-control strategy requires an integrated consideration of several factors, including degree of symptoms, likelihood of successful cardioversion, presence of comorbidities, and Methods: This was a pooled analysis of randomized studies comparing either rhythm control using antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) versus rate control (Subset A, four studies, 2,486 patients) or catheter ablation (CA) versus rate control (Subset B, seven studies, 1,112 patients) in patients with AF and HF. Rate control medications don't cure atrial fibrillation, so this medication regimen becomes life-long and may allow atrial enlargement, a condition where the atria enlarge due to being overworked. Recent research has shown that this increases the risk of stroke as well.
The cornerstones of atrial fibrillation (AF) management are rate control and anticoagulation [1, 19] and rhythm control for those symptomatically limited by AF. [] The clinical decision to use a rhythm-control or rate-control strategy requires an integrated consideration of several factors, including degree of symptoms, likelihood of successful cardioversion, presence of comorbidities, and
Aug 29, 2016 Both rate and rhythm control are options for treatment of atrial as a result of poor rate control may benefit from a rhythm control strategy in the
The developed control strategy leads to lesser performance requirements for the energy storage systems compared to the methods presented earlier. Further, Apr 9, 2015 A ratio control strategy can play a fundamental role in the safe and air flow rate can be the wild feed while fuel flow rate is the controlled feed. Rate control therapy for atrial fibrillation should be the primary treatment strategy for an older high-risk population, but should not be extrapolated to younger and